📹 Q3 Sales Review — Acme Corp
REC
47:23 4 participants
AK
Arun Kumar 🎤 Speaking
SR
Sarah R. (You)
🔇
MP
Mike P.
JL
Jenna Liu
Mishhy
LIVE
AK The pricing is too high compared to what Salesforce charges us today.
AK We need at least 30% below your standard rate
AI SUGGESTION
⚠ Objection detected — Price

Acknowledge the concern, then anchor to ROI. Their current Salesforce spend is ~$120K/yr. Your solution saves 340 hours/yr at their team size.

✌ Suggested response

"I hear you on pricing. Let's look at what you're actually spending today vs. what you'd save — most teams at your scale see payback in under 90 days."

340h saved/yr $120K Salesforce est. <90d payback 2 case studies
12:03 Pain point: Current Salesforce setup is costly and bloated
21:47 Budget: ~$80K approved, needs exec sign-off above that
34:10 Timeline: Decision by end of Q3, go-live Q4
41:22 Objection: Pricing needs to be 30% below standard rate
Now Discussing contract flexibility & legal review...
Price vs. Salesforce — use ROI framing
Integration complexity — highlight 2-week onboarding
Data security — SOC2 Type II certified
Vendor lock-in concern — emphasize data portability
340 hrs/yr saved at 10-person sales team
TechCorp (similar profile) saw 28% churn drop
Flexible annual vs. monthly billing available
Average implementation: 11 business days
INVISIBLE TO OTHERS